This time of the year, when lovers rejoice and cupid’s arrow is drawn, can also be a painful one for those left un-cuffed. Love is a tricky concept; often imagined as some sort of fantastical and mystical state of union with another, something that you will fall into the moment you lock eyes with your soon-to-be other half. It’s this amazing, life-changing thing that is so hard to attain but, paradoxically, so easy to be in. You think to yourself life would be so much easier in love. …

If nobody can agree on what someone has said, have they really said anything at all? In the realm of philosophical and theological texts, the answer is more or less yes. The boundless interpretations of the bible and Hegel should not undermine the depth and insight of such works.

But what about the public intellectual; those who either willingly or accidentally find themselves thrust into the arena of popular discourse? The comprehension of their work is now undoubtedly a responsibility. As Alan Lightman writes,

Such a person must be careful, he must be aware of the limitations of his knowledge…

Some public intellectuals have suggested that discussing reality and truth entails a healthy skepticism when attempting any solutions or answers. Although such thinkers may be engaging in intellectually insightful and honest discourse, they fail to explicitly satisfy that which may have pushed them into the public arena to begin with: a sense of what one is to do. Of course, any public figure that attempts to answer such an inquiry with any normative claim must also address David Hume’s IS/OUGHT problem; namely, one cannot derive an ought from an is; a moral fact from a physical one. …

Public intellectuals are a common feature of contemporary discourse. Leary, Lacan, Chomsky and Rand have all had their time in the spot-light, representing entire movements in public thought and political change. However, none of these figures lived in a time in which social media allowed for instantaneous communication and, thanks to the glorious algorithm, the formation of toxic echo-chambers. These modern tools, that have led to the rise of dogmatic loyalty and hyperbolic criticism, have never been more apparent than in the emergence of the controversial Canadian clinical psychologist Jordan B. Peterson.


Born in Edmonton in 1962, Peterson was raised…

Photo by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash

Depending on where you live, you’re potentially looking at a dark and lonely winter of increased cases, depression, loneliness and pants-free conference calls. Unfortunately, mental health has been yet another antagonist of this global pandemic, evident in the rise of almost all mental issues since the beginning. The constant locking down and opening up is probably tiring. Not seeing your friends or family is distressing and trying to not infect them when you do see them is perhaps equally stressful. And not seeing a concrete end in sight is just plain annoying. …

Philosophy and philosophers can be kinda depressing. Even the more hopeful theories and ideas still get to their conclusion with a healthy dose of sobering reality and pessimism. And then there’s pessimism itself, a branch of philosophy in which the conclusion is more or less “it is better to not be than to be”. Nobody has taken this to its extreme more than Phillip Mainlander, the philosopher who took his own life.


Born in Germany in 1841, and the product of his father forcing himself on his mother, Mainlander was the youngest of six siblings. His demanding father forced him…

Primary Sources

Camus, A. (1946). The human crisis: A lecture delivered in America, Spring 1946.

Carr, N. G. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember = The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. London: Atlantic Books.

Frankfurt, H. G. (2006). On bullshit: Sobre la manipulación de la verdad. Barcelona: Paidós.

Žižek, S. (2018). The courage of hopelessness: Chronicles of a year of acting dangerously / Slavoj Žižek. UK: Penguin Books.


Why Politicians Are Always Rich:

Paradox of tolerance:

Arendt, Pan-Movements & Democracy:

Pollution Inequality:

A Rational Guide To One Hell Of A Year

If you or a loved one is currently suffering from eco-anxiety, hopelessness, opiate addiction, social isolation, extremist political sentiment, or an absolute hatred for what humans have revealed themselves to be in times of crisis, you may be living in 2020.

Yes, it does suck that we are living through what will likely be the least popular destination for any time traveler. No, the fact that this one year sucks doesn’t mean that it’s one randomly bad year that will peacefully depart from us as soon as 2021 rolls around. …

Photo by Mishal Ibrahim on Unsplash

The first few years of our existence are characterized by a wide range of activities, beliefs and commitments that are either inherited or thrust upon us. Rarely challenged to forge a path of our own, who we are becomes more or less the agglomeration of our environment and genetics.

Until, of course, that fateful period when the training wheels are ripped off and suddenly we’re under the pressure to find out ‘the right thing to do’ all by ourselves. Do we go to university? Do we entertain the same political beliefs as our parents? Do we flirt with other religions…

Photo by Lauren Richmond on Unsplash

“Enjoy the little things in life because one day you’ll look back and realize they were the big things” -Kurt Vonnegut

Quotes like this are nice but quickly fill us with a certain dread; the fact that we have, and will likely continue, to live for the future, attached to seemingly unshakeable contracts, deadlines and aspirations. We sense that our kids smile, the dog greeting you at the door and those flowers on the way to work deserve our attention. Unfortunately, they rarely demand it. …

Ben Thomas

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store